Failure Mode and Effects Analysis 失效模式與效應分析

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
汽车行业质量体系 系列培训教材 潜在失效模式及后果分析 F M E A.
Advertisements

Chapter 1 品質管理概論.
CMD医疗器械风险管理培训班 主讲单位 北京国医械华光认证有限公司 Http// 培训服务部
第六章 可靠度試驗 報告者 授課老師 :郭秉裕 :童超塵 教授.
指導教授:童超塵 老師 研 究 生:蔣步海 王聖權 報告日期: 94/ 12/ 08
软件质量保证与测试 第2讲 软件测试的基本概念和方法
從研究生指導經驗談 研究生如何管理論文研究
APS先進規劃與排程系統 簡介與導入案例分享
二維品質模式與麻醉前訪視滿意度 中文摘要 麻醉前訪視,是麻醉醫護人員對病患提供麻醉相關資訊與服務,並建立良好醫病關係的第一次接觸。本研究目的是以Kano‘s 二維品質模式,設計病患滿意度問卷,探討麻醉前訪視內容與病患滿意度之關係,以期分析關鍵品質要素為何,作為提高病患對醫療滿意度之參考。 本研究於台灣北部某醫學中心,通過該院人體試驗委員會審查後進行。對象為婦科排程手術住院病患,其中實驗組共107位病患,在麻醉醫師訪視之前,安排先觀看麻醉流程衛教影片;另外對照組111位病患,則未提供衛教影片。問卷於麻醉醫師
積體電路設計的品質管理實務 主講人:陳世和.
11 物流仿真技术 11.1物流系统仿真 11.2 物流仿真方法 知识归纳 复习题.
專案品質管理 Project Quality Management
汽车可靠性技术 第二十八讲 主讲教师:杨志发                学时:32.
软件质量保证与测试 第4讲 软件测试依据和规范
ISO/TS16949:2002系列培训教材之四 A P Q P 产品质量先期策划 重庆集思杰管理顾问有限公司.
CSMC LAB Introduction (CSMC Web)
Thinking of Instrumentation Survivability Under Severe Accident
電子業組織規劃與 生產作業系統 宋忠儒.
ISO 9001條文簡介 ( 2000年版) ISO9001訓練教材之二 顧問師 林弘炤.
直流无刷电机驱动方案介绍 朱益杉 2018年5月24日 Power density: TECRT.
SPC introduction.
Excellence in Manufacturing 卓 越 制 造
现场总线Fieldbus.
Special English for Industrial Robot
軟體原型 (Software Prototyping)
The Empirical Study on the Correlation between Equity Incentive and Enterprise Performance for Listed Companies 上市公司股权激励与企业绩效相关性的实证研究 汇报人:白欣蓉 学 号:
全面生产管理TPM.
文思海辉全员质量培训 - 质量管理体系培训 Sep.2014
生產與作業管理 Chapter 15 物料需求管理 第七組組員: M 曾子鴻 M 李正文
統計製程品管與製程能力分析 Kenji Pan 統計製程品管與製程能力分析 Kenji Pan
運籌管理 Chapter 12 資訊科技與運籌管理電子化 祝天雄 博士 99年12月 日.
單元3:軟體設計 3-2 順序圖(Sequence Diagrams)
Popular Uses of ABC/M - the 1st half
Logistics 物流 昭安國際物流園區 總經理 曾玉勤.
Instructor : Sandy.Fan( )
AOI (Automatic Optical Inspection )
组合逻辑3 Combinational Logic
製程能力分析 何正斌 教授 國立屏東科技大學工業管理學系.
C10RGB0401(SD0190-V2) 膠體毛邊 Prepared by: 林煒梁 Date:
品質管理系統 華南品規課 鴻准精密模具有限公司 2018/12/6.
2-失效模式及效應分析FMEA FMEA F (Failure)失效 M(Mode)模式 E (Effect)效應
中灵电子(深圳)有限公司 Chung Ling Electronic (S. Z)CO
8D:8 DISCIPLINES 8D: 8 Discplines of Problem Solving 解決問題的8個步驟
DOE II建築節能模擬軟體介紹 -空調節能設計篇
Prepared by: Sophia Hsueh Date:4/17/2018
Social Process & Relationship
ISO9001:2008 GB/T19001:2008 换版动态.
Chap 4 軟體品質保證.
成品检查报告 Inspection Report
Red hot & Green leaves Item
质量检验员培训教程.
虚 拟 仪 器 virtual instrument
DEV 343 VS2005超快速开发方案/EEP2006控件包.
The viewpoint (culture) [观点(文化)]
SAP Training FI/CO Module MATERIAL ACCOUNTING COSTING VIEW
Social Process & Relationship
Project & Human Resource Management
James R. Evans. William M. Lindsay 張倫編譯
Create and Use the Authorization Objects in ABAP
严肃游戏设计—— Lab-Adventure
Enterprise Resource Planning System 企業資源規劃系統
DEV 343 VS2005超快速开发方案/EEP2006控件包.
高效洁净机械制造实验室是 2009 年教育部批准立项建设的重点实验室。实验室秉承“突出特色、创新发展“的宗旨,以求真务实的态度认真做好各项工作。 实验室主任为黄传真教授,实验室副主任为刘战强教授和李方义教授。学术委员会主任为中国工程院院士卢秉恒教授。实验室固定人员中,有中国工程院院士艾兴教授,教育部.
國立東華大學課程設計與潛能開發學系張德勝
MGT 213 System Management Server的昨天,今天和明天
Example for CIC Report CIS-I.
The Challenge of Human Resources Management
LF Vendor Monthly Report
External Corrective Action Request
CAI-Asia China, CATNet-Asia
Presentation transcript:

Failure Mode and Effects Analysis 失效模式與效應分析 1 of 33 FMEA Failure Mode and Effects Analysis 失效模式與效應分析 Prepared by : James.Zhou Issue date : April 12,2001

FMEA 意義說明 FMEA 是不良預防的工具,是一種 有條理程序可藉由一張包含所有 的失效模式的表,並以數據來表 2 of 33 FMEA 意義說明 FMEA 是不良預防的工具,是一種 有條理程序可藉由一張包含所有 的失效模式的表,並以數據來表 示風險的大小和預先採取預防改 善措施。

導入FMEA的優點 Team work 方式提高部門或Function 間連繫溝通,共同預防改善問題 3 of 33 導入FMEA的優點 Team work 方式提高部門或Function 間連繫溝通,共同預防改善問題 腦力激盪方式,讓每一成員在同一議題上發揮想像力, 經由有系統整合 提出有效之預防改善對策 徹底了解產品功能架構圖或產品製造組合流程圖 以魚骨圖分析方式列出失效模式每一種可能因子 以失效樹分析(FTA)方法了解產品失效模式各種組合型式 把失效模式量化針對Top Failure Mode 優先採取對策預防 確保所有想像得到失效模式和影響,在正常操作情況之下均被考慮到 藉由過去的資料給未來參考, 協助分析失效的範圍和影響性 提供設計產品或製程管制預防採取對策時使用

FMEA相關名詞解說 Core team :列出與FMEA team 相關人員名字,部門與職責 Failure mode :失效模式種類 4 of 33 FMEA相關名詞解說 Core team :列出與FMEA team 相關人員名字,部門與職責 Failure mode :失效模式種類 Effect :失效後對產品產生影響 Cause :造成失效模式之原因 Severity :失效模式發生之嚴重程度等級(1~10) Occurrence :失效模式之發生頻度等級(1~10) Detection :失效模式發生可被偵測程度等級(1~10) RPN : Risk Priority Number 指評估風險及優先處理指數 是Severity * Occurrence * Detection 之乘積 FTA :Fault tree analysis 是失效樹分析是導果為因由頂端 事件利用邏輯(OR 或 AND) 持續分析第1.2…層直 至真正Root cause 將這些原因謀求徹底改善

FMEA書籍相關名詞解說 QFD : Quality Function Deployment 5 of 33 FMEA書籍相關名詞解說 QFD : Quality Function Deployment DOE : Design of Experiments VOC : Voice of Customer VOE : Voice of Engineering SOP : Standard Operation Procedure SIP : Standard Inspection Procedure FRACAS : Failure Report Analysis and Corrective Action System SPC : Statistic Process Control TQM : Total Quality Management DVT : Design Valuation Test MTBF : Mean Time Between Failure

FMEA 型式 SYSTEM SFMEA Design DFMEA * Component * Unit * Module 6 of 33 FMEA 型式 SYSTEM SFMEA Design DFMEA * Component * Unit * Module Process PFMEA Machine MFMEA Equipment EFMEA Service SFMEA

設計 FMEA 流程(DFMEA) 7 of 33 組成FMEA團隊 蒐集資料 完成FMEA執行方案 硬品架構 系統特性 系統功能 失效報告。分析 與改正作業系統 (FRACAS) 分析失效模式 分析失效原因 分析設計管制方法 分析失效效應 分析發生率 分析難檢度 分析嚴重度 計算關鍵指數 決定關鍵性 失效模式 設計改善 建議改正行動 撰寫報告 設計審查 評估資料 設計改善 參考資料 可靠度分析 參考資料 維護度分析 參考資料 標準檢驗 程序資料 教育訓練 參考資料

製程 FMEA 流程(PFMEA) 8 of 33 組成FMEA團隊 蒐集資料 完成FMEA執行方案 分析製程特性 定義製造流程 分析產品特性 失效報告。分析 與改正作業系統 (FRACAS) 分析失效模式 分析失效原因 分析現行管制方法 分析失效效應 分析發生率 分析難檢度 分析嚴重度 計算關鍵指數 決定關鍵性 失效模式 製程改善 建議改正行動 檢驗程序改善 撰寫報告 設計審查 評估資料 設計改善 參考資料 新製程設計 參考資料 標準檢驗 程序資料 教育訓練 參考資料

FMEA 實施步驟 1. 決定FMEA 對象 2. 成立&組成FMEA team members 3. 收集&準備相似產品之歷史資料 9 of 33 FMEA 實施步驟 1. 決定FMEA 對象 2. 成立&組成FMEA team members 3. 收集&準備相似產品之歷史資料 4. 列出產品方塊圖或製程流程圖 5. 列出Failure mode 各種可能情況 6. 列出Failure mode 對產品/機器之 影響 (Effect) 7. 魚骨圖分析造成此Failure mode 之可能原因 (Cause) 8. 根據相關產品之歷史資料定義出 Severity /Occurrence Detection 之等級 9. 根據 S/O/D 的定義定出每個 Failure mode 之 S/O/D 值 10. 列出相似Model 目前採行之Action 11. 計算出 RPN=S*O*D 值 12. 取 RPN 值 ≧100 (值大小需定義) or Top 20% 優先採取對策 13. 針對 RPN 值超出上述定之項目提 出Action 再改善 14. 定出 Action item 之 owner 及完成 日期 15. Action 切入後檢視其效果及切入時 間點 16. 重新計算Action 後之 RPN 值 17. 若 RPN 值未達定義要求 RPN ≧100 or Top 20% 回覆到 item 13 重提 Action 18. 若 RPN 達到要求完成 FMEA 表格

FMEA Team Members DFMEA (Design) * Program Manager (PM) 10 of 33 FMEA Team Members DFMEA (Design) Chairperson * Program Manager (PM) * Electronic Engineer (EE) * Mechanical Engineer (ME) * Quality Engineer (QE) * Quality Engineer (QA) * Manufacturing (MES) Support Team * Purchasing (Buyer) if Need PFMEA (Process) Chairperson * Program Manager (PM) * Quality Engineer (QA) * Industry Engineer (IE) * Mechanical Engineer (MFG ME) * Test Engineer (TE) * Manufacture Supervisor (MFG) * Electronic Engineer (EE) if Need * Mechanical Engineer (ME) if Need

Failure Mode Fishbone Analysis 11 of 33 Failure Mode Fishbone Analysis 第一層分析 Material 第一層分析 Workmanship 第二層分析 第三層分析 第四層分析 第三層分析 第二層分析 錫面 正面裝插 變壓器不良 零件插歪斜 零件變形 絕緣tape破 PCB不良 零件面有異物 零件碰case 引腳超出base 組立 無線尾 零件相碰 焊點過大造成tape破 Y電容不良 Power Cable破 Hi-Pot 不良 Failure Mode (Defect) EMI不良 加工不良 Case不良 Layout 安規距離不夠 儀器設備 Arcing 規定過嚴 測試條件設錯 測試線接錯 鎖螺絲過長 儀器設定 O/I寫錯 零件間安規距離不足 套管短 零件本体大Layout 面積小 第三層分析 第二層分析 第二層分析 第三層分析 第一層分析 Test 第一層分析 Design

Fault Tree Analysis For Hi-Pot Failure 12 of 33 Hi-Pot Failure Analysis Process Design Material Test 其 他 1. 加 工 不 良 2. 組 立 3. 正 面 裝 插 4. 錫 面 5. 板 邊 零 件 傾 斜 踫 Case, 造 成 安 規 距 離 不 夠 1. Layout 安 規 距 離 不 夠 2. 元 件 之 間 安 規 距 離 不夠 3. Arcing 規 格 過 嚴 4. 板 邊 零 件 與 Case 安 規 距 離 不 夠 1. 光 藕 合 器 不 良 2. 接 地 小 黃 豆 電 容 耐 壓 不 夠 3. Case 4. EMI Socket 5. PCB 6. 線 材 Power Cable 破 7. Y 電 容 不 良 8. 膠 雜 質 過 多 9. 變 壓 器 PFC ︵ 電 感 ︶ 1. 儀 器 2. 儀 器 設 定 1. Socket Y 電 容 線 腳 斷 2. 接 地 銅 箔 被 燒 斷 3. 接 地 跳 線 斷 4. 未 依 O/I 作 業 5. 油 墨, 黑 色 Mark 筆, 在 初 級 側 導 電 a. Socket FG 線 漏 焊 b. Socket 上 Y 電 容 線 腳 靠 近 馬 口 鐵 c. 膠 布 沒 貼 到 位 a. FG 線 有 無 Touch 任 何 零 件 b. 絕 緣 片 膠 布 破 c. 組 立 時, B+ B- 線 壓 傷 破 d. PCB 沒 有 卡 到位 e. O/I 寫 錯 誤 f. 絕 緣 片 放 置 不 當 或 漏 裝 g. 掉 金 屬 物 進 產 品 h. 鎖 絲 未 緊 或 漏 a. 無 線 尾 b. 零 件 面 有 異 物 c. 零 件 插 歪 斜 a. 異 物 b. 漏 焊 ︵ Y 電 容 ︶ c. 線 腳 過 長 d. 錫 面 短 路 ︵ 珠, 渣 ︶ a. 原 件 本 体 大 Layout 面 積 小 b. 套 管 短 c. 鎖 螺 絲 過 長 a. 碎 屑 b. 耳 掛 有 凸 起 c. 有 毛 刺 a. FG 線 氧 化 不 吃 錫 b. 本 身 耐 壓 不 夠 a. PCB 受 潮 b. Trace 近 似 短 路 或 開 a. 絕 緣 膠 布 位 置 不 恰 當 b. 引 線 腳 超 出 base c. 焊 點 過 大, 造 成 錫 間 賜 破 絕 緣 層 d. 零 件 本 体 歪 斜 e. 絕 緣 Tape 破 f. 本 身 繞 線 造 成 Arcing 過 大 a. 接 觸 不 良 b. 儀 器 本 身 電 壓 頻 率 誤 差 大 a. 測 試 線 接 錯 b. O/I 寫 錯 誤 c. 測 試 條 件 設 置 錯 誤 相 互 碰 撞 碰 H/S 碰 T1 碰 Case 零 件 變 形

FMEA 格式逐項解說 This column is used to list the part name 13 of 33 FMEA 格式逐項解說 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. Severity Occurrence Detection RPN Severity Occurrence Detection RPN Part Failure Mode Effect(s) Cause(s) Current or Action(s) to Area or Action(s) Name * Control(s) be taken Individual taken Function responsible Energy Management Cannot Customer Software Monitor dissatisfaction Failure Monitor Battery Battery alert Battery user of status connections spec. wrong Incorrect battery used Cannot Customer Software accurately dissatisfaction failure ID status Battery Connections damage spec. wrong Unable to detect battery Faults This column is used to list the part name and function. List all the functions for the functional block

FMEA 格式逐項解說 In the failure mode column, list each of the failure 2. 1. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. Severity Occurrence Detection RPN Severity Occurrence Detection RPN Part Failure Mode Effect(s) Cause(s) Current or Action(s) to Area or Action(s) Name * Control(s) be taken Individual taken Function responsible Energy Management Cannot Customer Software Monitor dissatisfaction Failure Monitor Battery Battery alert Battery user of status connections spec. wrong Incorrect battery used Cannot Customer Software accurately dissatisfaction failure ID status Battery Connections damage spec. wrong Unable to detect battery Faults In the failure mode column, list each of the failure modes for the function.

FMEA 格式逐項解說 List the effects of failure for each of the failure modes. 3. 1. 2. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. Severity Occurrence Detection RPN Severity Occurrence Detection RPN Part Failure Mode Effect(s) Cause(s) Current or Action(s) to Area or Action(s) Name * Control(s) be taken Individual taken Function responsible Energy Management Cannot Customer Software Monitor dissatisfaction Failure Monitor Battery Battery alert Battery user of status connections spec. wrong Incorrect battery used Cannot Customer Software accurately dissatisfaction failure ID status Battery Connections damage spec. wrong Unable to detect battery Faults List the effects of failure for each of the failure modes.

FMEA 格式逐項解說 For each one of the effects, list the 4. 1. 2. 3. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. Severity Occurrence Detection RPN Severity Occurrence Detection RPN Part Failure Mode Effect(s) Cause(s) Current or Action(s) to Area or Action(s) Name * Control(s) be taken Individual taken Function responsible Energy Management Cannot Customer Software Monitor dissatisfaction Failure Monitor Battery Battery alert Battery user of status connections spec. wrong Incorrect battery used Cannot Customer Software accurately dissatisfaction failure ID status Battery Connections damage spec. wrong Unable to detect battery Faults For each one of the effects, list the severity (scale from 1 to 10)

17 of 33 符合需求 ,

FMEA 格式逐項解說 The Class column is optional. It is 18 of 33 5. 1. 2. 3. 4. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. Severity Occurrence Detection RPN Severity Occurrence Detection RPN Part Failure Mode Effect(s) Cause(s) Current or Action(s) to Area or Action(s) Name * Control(s) be taken Individual taken Function responsible Energy Management Cannot Customer Software Monitor dissatisfaction Failure Monitor Battery Battery alert Battery user of status connections spec. wrong Incorrect battery used Cannot Customer Software accurately dissatisfaction failure ID status Battery Connections damage spec. wrong Unable to detect battery Faults The Class column is optional. It is typically used if the severity is 9 or 10.

FMEA 格式逐項解說 In the Cause column, list the causes for each failure mode 19 of 33 6. 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. Severity Occurrence Detection RPN Severity Occurrence Detection RPN Part Failure Mode Effect(s) Cause(s) Current or Action(s) to Area or Action(s) Name * Control(s) be taken Individual taken Function responsible Energy Management Cannot Customer Software Monitor dissatisfaction Failure Monitor Battery Battery alert Battery user of status connections spec. wrong Incorrect battery used Cannot Customer Software accurately dissatisfaction failure ID status Battery Connections damage spec. wrong Unable to detect battery Faults In the Cause column, list the causes for each failure mode

Linking Failure Mode to 20 of 33 FMEA Model Linking Failure Mode to Cause and Effect Cause Failure Mode (Defect) Effect

FMEA 格式逐項解說 Estimate the likelihood of the 7. 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. Severity Occurrence Detection RPN Severity Occurrence Detection RPN Part Failure Mode Effect(s) Cause(s) Current or Action(s) to Area or Action(s) Name * Control(s) be taken Individual taken Function responsible Energy Management Cannot Customer Software Monitor dissatisfaction Failure Monitor Battery Battery alert Battery user of status connections spec. wrong Incorrect battery used Cannot Customer Software accurately dissatisfaction failure ID status Battery Connections damage spec. wrong Unable to detect battery Faults Estimate the likelihood of the “causes” happening on a “1 to 10” scale. The higher the number the more likely the “causes” will occur.

22 of 33

FMEA 格式逐項解說 List the prevention, design validation/ 23 of 33 8. 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 9. 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. Severity Occurrence Detection RPN Severity Occurrence Detection RPN Part Failure Mode Effect(s) Cause(s) Current or Action(s) to Area or Action(s) Name * Control(s) be taken Individual taken Function responsible Energy Management Cannot Customer Software Monitor dissatisfaction Failure Monitor Battery Battery alert Battery user of status connections spec. wrong Incorrect battery used Cannot Customer Software accurately dissatisfaction failure ID status Battery Connections damage spec. wrong Unable to detect battery Faults List the prevention, design validation/ verification, or other activities which will assure the design adequacy for the failure mode and/or cause / mechanism under consideration. Tests Design reviews, Mathematical studies, Fail/safe (Example: redundant power supplies)

FMEA 格式逐項解說 Estimate the likelihood of the 9. 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. Severity Occurrence Detection RPN Severity Occurrence Detection RPN Part Failure Mode Effect(s) Cause(s) Current or Action(s) to Area or Action(s) Name * Control(s) be taken Individual taken Function responsible Energy Management Cannot Customer Software Monitor dissatisfaction Failure Monitor Battery Battery alert Battery user of status connections spec. wrong Incorrect battery used Cannot Customer Software accurately dissatisfaction failure ID status Battery Connections damage spec. wrong Unable to detect battery Faults Estimate the likelihood of the detection on a “1 to 10” scale. The lower the number the more likely the cause will be detected.

25 of 33

FMEA 格式逐項解說 RPN (Risk Priority Number) is the 26 of 33 10. 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. Severity Occurrence Detection RPN Severity Occurrence Detection RPN Part Failure Mode Effect(s) Cause(s) Current or Action(s) to Area or Action(s) Name * Control(s) be taken Individual taken Function responsible Energy Management Cannot Customer Software Monitor dissatisfaction Failure Monitor Battery Battery alert Battery user of status connections spec. wrong Incorrect battery used Cannot Customer Software accurately dissatisfaction failure ID status Battery Connections damage spec. wrong Unable to detect battery Faults RPN (Risk Priority Number) is the product of Severity, Occurrence, and Detection. The higher the number, the higher the risk.

FMEA 格式逐項解說 What actions need to be taken to prevent the Failure Mode? 27 of 33 11. 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 12. 13. 14. 15. Severity Occurrence Detection RPN Severity Occurrence Detection RPN Part Failure Mode Effect(s) Cause(s) Current or Action(s) to Area or Action(s) Name * Control(s) be taken Individual taken Function responsible Energy Management Cannot Customer Software Monitor dissatisfaction Failure Monitor Battery Battery alert Battery user of status connections spec. wrong Incorrect battery used Cannot Customer Software accurately dissatisfaction failure ID status Battery Connections damage spec. wrong Unable to detect battery Faults What actions need to be taken to prevent the Failure Mode? If no action is taken, record “none”

FMEA 格式逐項解說 Assign appropriate individual, area, function or team. 28 of 33 12. 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 13. 14. 15. Severity Occurrence Detection RPN Severity Occurrence Detection RPN Part Failure Mode Effect(s) Cause(s) Current or Action(s) to Area or Action(s) Name * Control(s) be taken Individual taken Function responsible Energy Management Cannot Customer Software Monitor dissatisfaction Failure Monitor Battery Battery alert Battery user of status connections spec. wrong Incorrect battery used Cannot Customer Software accurately dissatisfaction failure ID status Battery Connections damage spec. wrong Unable to detect battery Faults Assign appropriate individual, area, function or team. Set a realistic target for completion Target date could be established by development program

FMEA 格式逐項解說 List the results of the actions taken. 13. 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. 14. 15. Severity Occurrence Detection RPN Severity Occurrence Detection RPN Part Failure Mode Effect(s) Cause(s) Current or Action(s) to Area or Action(s) Name * Control(s) be taken Individual taken Function responsible Energy Management Cannot Customer Software Monitor dissatisfaction Failure Monitor Battery Battery alert Battery user of status connections spec. wrong Incorrect battery used Cannot Customer Software accurately dissatisfaction failure ID status Battery Connections damage spec. wrong Unable to detect battery Faults List the results of the actions taken. Always enter a reference such as data or test reports.

FMEA 格式逐項解說 When reassessing SEVERITY, the 30 of 33 14. 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. 13. 15. Severity Occurrence Detection RPN Severity Occurrence Detection RPN Part Failure Mode Effect(s) Cause(s) Current or Action(s) to Area or Action(s) Name * Control(s) be taken Individual taken Function responsible Energy Management Cannot Customer Software Monitor dissatisfaction Failure Monitor Battery Battery alert Battery user of status connections spec. wrong Incorrect battery used Cannot Customer Software accurately dissatisfaction failure ID status Battery Connections damage spec. wrong Unable to detect battery Faults When reassessing SEVERITY, the only factors that will influence a change will be: new experience change in regulations design change change in customer priorities

FMEA 格式逐項解說 If this RPN is not significantly less 31 of 33 15. 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. Severity Occurrence Detection RPN Severity Occurrence Detection RPN Part Failure Mode Effect(s) Cause(s) Current or Action(s) to Area or Action(s) Name * Control(s) be taken Individual taken Function responsible Energy Management Cannot Customer Software Monitor dissatisfaction Failure Monitor Battery Battery alert Battery user of status connections spec. wrong Incorrect battery used Cannot Customer Software accurately dissatisfaction failure ID status Battery Connections damage spec. wrong Unable to detect battery Faults If this RPN is not significantly less than previous, then ACTION taken has been ineffective.

<<範例>> 32 of 33

<<範例>> 33 of 33