Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
1
訂購分析 Licensing Analysis
石美玉 (Mei-yuh Shih) 科學技術資料中心國外資源組 International Resources Division, STIC November 19, 2003
2
Presentation Outline 2004年引進電子資源 E-Resources Licensed for 2004 訂購分析
Licensing Analysis 結論 Conclusion
3
Background … 本簡報的分析資源不包含以National Academic License 引進的資料庫:
Analysis in this presentation doesn’t include the nationally academic licensed e-resources: 2004:Grolier Online, OCLC FirstSearch Base Package, PQDD, SwetsWise
4
E-Resources Licensed for 2004
2004年引進電子資源 E-Resources Licensed for 2004
5
E-Resources Licensed for 2004
書目資料庫 Bibliographic databases 全文資料庫 Fulltext databases 電子期刊 E-journals 參考資料庫 Reference databases 網路版之書目管理軟體 Web-based Bibliographic Management Tool
6
2004 Licensing: Bibliographic Databases
CSA IDS (10) EBSCOhost (2) Ei EV2 (1) Ovid (11) SciFinderScholar (1) OCLC FS WorldCat (1) Web of Science (3) SilverPlatter: WebSPIRS (8) (#) - 括號內的數字代表各系統資料庫數目 (#) - represent number of databases for each system
7
2004 Licensing: Fulltext Databases
Chadwyck-Healey (1) EBSCOhost (4) LexisNexis (1) ProQuest (6) SilverPlatter WebSpirs (7)
8
2004 Licensing: Reference Databases
Bowker (2) Gale (2) Journal Citation Reports on the Web (2) Ovid - (2) SilverPlatter - WebSPIRS (3) 臺灣經濟新報 (2) * * 為2004年新增的資料庫,不列入分析比較 * New for 2004, will not be included in the analysis
9
2004 Licensing: E-journals
IEEE/IEE Electronic Library (IEL) Online JSTOR Nature Journals Online ScienceDirect OnSite (SDOS) SpringerLink Emerald Fulltext* 工程學刊資料庫 (1) * * 為2004年新增的資料庫,不列入分析比較 * New for 2004, will not be included in the analysis
10
2004 Licensing: Web-based Bibliographic Management Tool
RefWorks* * 為2004年新增的資料庫,不列入分析比較 * New for 2004, will not be included in the analysis
11
2004年訂購分析 2004 Licensing Analysis
13
Overall Analysis … 政府政策對CONCERT-大學校院之影響(二) Government’s Policy Influences the Licensing Power (II)
教育部以JCR之期刊影響係數評量教師研究成果, 影響學校對資料庫之訂購, 部分聯盟會員將經費移 轉訂購WOS及JCR 等資料庫 Government use Journal Citation Reports on the Web (JCR) To evaluate the qualification of college faculties, some members shifted their budget from licensing other databases to Web of Science and/or JCR.
14
會員訂購考量 Members’ Licensing Concern
聯盟會員開始注重單一平台的重要性,陸續將資料庫轉至另一易於使用的平台 Members turn attention to the one-platform feature: they shift orders from their original platform to the preferable user-friendly ones for same or similar databases.
16
Bibliographic Databases
ISI是大贏家, WOS的三個資料庫訂購總金額佔書目資料庫市場的50% ISI is a big winner, three bibliographic databases of WOS occupy 50% of the market
17
Fulltext Databases ProQuest為全文資料庫的贏家, 六個資料庫訂購總金額佔全文資料庫市場的53.3%
ProQuest is the winner, occupies 53.3% of the fulltext databases market
18
E-journals Covers 43% of consortial total licensing amount for 2004
電子期刊訂購量成長迅速,2004年的訂購金額佔聯盟所有訂購額的43% Covers 43% of consortial total licensing amount for 2004 IEL及Elsevier為電子期刊 的二大贏家,訂購金額佔 電子期刊的91.41% IEL and Elsevier are two bigger winners, their total licensing value occupies 91.41% of the e-journal market
19
Reference JCR訂購數成長20%, 其訂購金額佔參考性資料庫的69%
The growth of JCR licensing is 20% ; the total value occupies 69% of this market
21
Licensing Power Analysis
訂購實力分析 Licensing Power Analysis
23
會員訂購實力 Members’ Licensing Power
會員訂購實力增強: Members’ licensing power has been enhanced: 2003年有44個單位未透過CONCERT訂購任何電子資源,2004年降為23個單位 the “non-participating” members have been decreased from 44 for 2003 down to 23 for 2004 2003年有86個會員訂購1-5個資料庫; 2004年有93個會員訂購1-5個資料庫 In 2003, there were 86 members licensed 1-5 databases; in 2004, there will be 93 2003年有8 個會員訂購16-20個資料庫; 2004年則有16個會員訂購16-20個資料庫 In 2003, there were 8 members licensed databases; in 2004, there will be 16
27
Conclusion 建議政府: Suggestion to our government:
持續提供補助款支源電子資源的訂購,以提昇國內研發環境 Initiate policy budgeting for the R&D E-resources 成立一電子資源督導小組,定期至各單位瞭解其電子資源選擇標準及經費運用的績效 Set up an advisory committee to evaluate the R&D performance of each subsidized colleges
28
Thank you very much for your time.
Similar presentations