国际期刊投稿指南 —以Emerald为例 赵孟元 出版关系主管 Email: pub@emeraldinsight.com.cn Mobile: 186-11669167

内容 1. 投稿准备流程 2. 审稿及成功发表 3. 中国作者常见问题 4. Emerald学术研究基金

关于 Emerald 主要学科： 管理学，其他人文社会科学 1、管理学期刊 270+种 2、图书 2000多种 3、案例 250多种 1967年，英国，百强商学院之一Bradford University Management Center 独立主编：期刊主编主要为学术个体，保持学术研究的独立性和个性化，良好的持续性 总部英国，主编全球，内容国际 主要学科： 管理学，其他人文社会科学 1、管理学期刊 270+种 2、图书 2000多种 3、案例 250多种

论文准备-以Emerald 投稿为例 1、选择目标期刊— 关键词检索、同行推荐等

Emerald 期刊推荐之一 Chinese Management Studies(SSCI) 数量：141篇文章，论文106篇、编者案27篇、书评6篇和评论2篇（截止2011年） 地区：25个国家地区，top 5为中国45篇、美国23篇、新加坡19篇、澳大利亚12篇和英国9篇 机构：中国人民大学、中山大学、清华大学、华中科技大学都有4篇论文、西安交通大学有3篇 主题范围：中国本土价值观与管理思想； 中国卓越管理实践；中国经济与全球经； 企业管理模式； 商务策略； 商务文化与道德；外贸与投资；企业增长与变革管理； 国有企业改革与发展；公司的个人与组织行为；人力资源开发与管理；市场营销；中国宏观经济管理； 中国政府与行政管理

Emerald 期刊推荐之一 Analysis of political risks and opportunities in public private partnerships (PPP) in China and selected Asian countries Survey results 作者：Sachs, Tillmann; Tiong, Robert; Wang, Shou Qing 出版卷次：2007年Volume: 1 Issue: 2 被引次数：12 Organizational changes in Chinese companies: a resource-based view 作者：Alas, Ruth; Sun, Wei 出版卷次：2007 年 Volume: 1 Issue: 4 被引次数: 9 Management by values A theoretical proposal for strategic human resource management in China 作者: Zhang, Yingying; Dolan, Simon; Zhou, Yu 出版卷次: 2009年 Volume: 3 Issue: 4 被引次数: 8 Guanxi and its role in business 作者: Wong, Meiling 出版卷次: 2007 年 Volume: 1 Issue: 4 CMS每年发表文献数 CMS每年的引文

Emerald期刊推荐之二 Auditing, Accounting & Accountability Journal(SSCI) 地区：前五位的依次是澳大利亚、英格兰、苏格兰、加拿大和意大利；中国作者有3篇 主题范围： 对可见实践的其它解释； 从批判与历史的角度分析当前主题与问题； 支撑理论发展的实地研究； 当前会计计量的局限； 会计准则的社会和政治方面 扩大报告区域的范围

Emerald推荐期刊之二 Manufacturing competition: how accounting practices shape strategy making in cities 作者：Kornberger, Martin; Carter, Chris 出版卷次：2010年 Volume: 23 Issue: 3 被引次数：9 Sustainability accounting and reporting: fad or trend? 作者：Burritt, Roger L.; Schaltegger, Stefan 出版卷次：2010年 Volume: 23 Issue: 7 被引次数：7 The edge of legitimacy Voluntary social and environmental reporting in Rothmans' 1956-1999 annual reports 作者：Tilling, Matthew V.; Tilt, Carol A. 出版卷次：2010年 Volume: 23 Issue: 1 被引次数：6 AAAJ每年发表文献数 AJJJ每年的引文

论文准备-以Emerald 投稿为例 结构性摘要 2、修改论文格式——参考Author Guidelines 报道性摘要 指示性摘要 标题: 最少的单词，表达最充分的意思 Emerald期刊一般要求论文题目不超过8个英文单词 摘要： 结构性摘要 出现于20世纪80年代后期 明显不同之处在于行文中用醒目的字体(黑体、全部大写、或斜体),直接标出目的、方法、结果、结论等以便于读者了解论文的内容 Emerald采用这种摘要类型。 报道性摘要 资料性或情报性摘要 主要总结论文中的主要发现，运用于描述实验研究类论文和创新价值较大的、主题单一的文献.它向读者提供原文中的全部创新内容，提供尽可能多的定量或定性的信息。 指示性摘要 介绍性摘要，也称陈述性摘要。 主要介绍论文的论题和目的，用简单的几句话使读者对论文所研究的主要内容有一概括的了解，不需要介绍方法、结果、结论的具体内容，也不需要用数据进行定量描述。

论文准备-以Emerald 投稿为例 结构性摘要举例 Milorad M. Novicevic, Mario Hayek, Tony Fang, (2011) "Integrating Barnard's and contemporary views of industrial relations and HRM", Journal of Management History, Vol. 17 Iss: 1, pp.126 - 138 Abstract Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to juxtapose the contemporary views of industrial relations (IR) and human resource management (HRM) with the ideas expressed by Chester Barnard. Design/methodology/approach – The paper analyzes Chester Barnard's views along the four premises that underlie contemporary perspectives on the fields of IR and HRM. Findings – Barnard's main points: that sincerity and honesty of management is crucial to developing an individual employee's will to collaborate, and that collective cooperation is superior to collective bargaining are found to resonate well with the contemporary views and provide a clear indication for Barnard's preference of human resource perspective to the IR perspective. Practical implications – This paper provides Barnard's practical insights into why managing IR and HR by policies leads to poor management. Originality/value – This paper is the first to recognize Barnard's unique contribution to contemporary perspectives on IR and HRM disciplines. Keywords: Employee relations, Human resource management, Industrial relations, Organizations

论文准备-以Emerald 投稿为例 Case study Literature review Viewpoint Research 关键词：数量限制，一般4-6个 论文类型：7种 （见右图） 正文：字数限制4,000~6,000单词 论文结构 参考文献: Case study Literature review Viewpoint General Technical paper Research Conceptual Harvard style:哈佛格式，作者在正文中用圆括号注出所引用文献的作者和出版年，在文后参考文献列表中提供所引文献的详细信息，参考文献列表以作者姓氏的字母顺序排序。 MLA (the Modern Language Association):美国现代语言协会制定的论文指导格式，一般偏重应用于人文科学领域。 APA(the American Psychological Association):美国心理学会 所发行的出版手册规定的格式要求，一般应用于心理学，教育学等。 Paper Type

论文准备-以Emerald 投稿为例 参考文献举例-数量；时间；质量 A F

论文准备-以Emerald 投稿为例 论文准备-以Emerald 投稿为例 3、准备论文提交材料 不包含任何作者信息的论文正文 文章标题页(Article title page):其中包括作者简介、摘要、论文题目等信息 建议随附上covering letter 推荐covering letter ，应该包括2条有效信息： 陈述要向这本期刊投稿的原因，尤其是您的文章与众不同，或者超出了期刊的范围的时候 阐述本文是否引用或参考了与其主题相似但已发表在其他期刊上的论文 恰当的covering letter应如此表述： I am submitting this article to Journal of Documentation. You will see that it deals with public library management, which I appreciate is outside JDoc's normal scope. However, it focuses on the novel application of a theoretical model to the topic, and hence I think it is appropriate for JDoc. I am submitting an article with a similar title to 'Public Library Journal'. However, that article gives a series of case studies, rather than describing and applying the model, and so is quite distinct from the paper submitted here. I can send a copy of the PLJ paper if required. 不建议使用的covering letter: I am sending this article for you to publish in Journal of Documentation, after your editorial amendments. I have chosen JDoc to publish this paper, as it is a high-impact and well-regarded journal.

评审指南 1. Originality: Does the paper contain new and significant information adequate to justify publication? 2. Relationship to Literature: Does the paper demonstrate an adequate understanding of the relevant literature in the field and cite an appropriate range of literature sources? 3. Methodology: Is the paper's argument built on an appropriate base of theory, concepts, or other ideas? Has the research or equivalent intellectual work on which the paper is based been well designed? Are the methods employed appropriate?

评审指南 4. Results: Are results presented clearly and analyzed appropriately? Do the conclusions adequately tie together the other elements of the paper? 5. Practicality and/or Research implications: Does the paper identify clearly any implications for practice and/or further research? Are these implications consistent with the findings and conclusions of the paper? 6. Quality of Communication: Does the paper clearly express its case, measured against the technical language of the field and the expected knowledge of the journal's readership? Has attention been paid to the clarity of expression and readability, such as sentence structure, jargon use, acronyms, etc..

论文准备 - 在线提交系统ScholarOne 4、正确投稿方式— Author Guidelines ScholarOne 在线提交系统

审稿及成功发表 - 论文审稿流程 审稿方式：两轮同行双盲评审 审稿周期： 从提交到收到初次反馈;3~3.5个月 发表周期3个月、1年不等 审稿及成功发表 - 论文审稿流程 审稿方式：两轮同行双盲评审 审稿周期： 从提交到收到初次反馈;3~3.5个月 发表周期3个月、1年不等 审稿结果： 拒绝— 选题问题，改投其他期刊 修改—根据评审意见进行修改、意见不同之处积极 与主编沟通 再次提交：修改时间，随附修改Notes

审稿及成功发表 - 修改说明 Revision Notes Ref # Reviewer Comment Author Response 审稿及成功发表 - 修改说明 Revision Notes Ref # Reviewer Comment Author Response You imply that you do not wish to see a tutorial to CAR (even though one reviewer thinks that this is needed since some sections of the MISQ readership may not be familiar with CAR). We concur with you and have removed the tutorial aspects. The front end of the paper (pages 2-5) has been revised in order to outline the research and practical problems that we focused on. We agree that the research-practice gap needs to be positioned clearly as an intellectual challenge (as highlighted on page 3). We have now deliberately positioned the paper in this way with the challenge manifested in the action-research dichotomy, where either action or research tends to be the focus of action research projects (as explained on page 3). We also substantiate our arguments better in the broader CAR literature (as detailed from pages 5-14). Next response Better grounding of the problem. Parts of the front-end of the paper read like a tutorial-like introduction of action research. In a rewrite, there are two things that I would like to see instead. I would expect a clearer attempt to establish the research-practice gap as an intellectual challenge. This is the main theme of the paper and it would therefore be useful to substantiate your understanding of this gap beyond the surface level. Next comment

审稿及成功发表 - 论文发表 所有期刊电子版 3个月免费访问权 Literati network 评奖 一本纸本期刊

Tips 无版面费、无审稿费 获取文中非原创文字、图标或图片及公开网站信息的相关版权许可 文中表格需要单独文档提交 供作者参考其他资源(www.emeraldinsight.com) 作者专栏 学者园地

中国作者常见问题 1. 不严格遵守投稿指南，如字数超限等。 Solution: 仔细阅读 每本期刊的Author Guideline。 2. 论文内容与期刊内容方向不符。 Solution：投稿前先将摘要发给期刊主编，如方向不符，另择期刊投稿。 3. 英语语法、词句错误较多。 Solution：寻求合作作者或专业的第三方做proofreading。 4. 文章缺乏创新性，有抄袭（plagiarism)现象。 Solution：论文完成后，在 turn it in 等专业检测论文相似度的网站检测，修改调整。

Voices from editors The authors from China do ignore the submission guidelines then try to negotiate the word length and other issues. This is difficult for editors. In several cases they have refused to shorten their papers to the 6,000 word limit. In one case an author said that if I wanted to cut the paper I could eliminate the references. This week I received a paper that was 20,000 words, and the author complained when I returned it. I let them know that the guidelines are not negotiable, but the Chinese authors are the only ones in the world that protest the requests for changes. This has been very surprising. that we simply don't understand; following instructions (for example, structured abstract) is still a problem. the major issue relates to the fact that most papers do not contribute to the field and scope of the journal. Paper are either a plug and play (replication of previous studies) , data crunching statistical analysis with no implications and/or papers that do not fit the scope of the journal

Voices from Editors papers by Chinese authors are more likely to contain English grammar problems, not conform to the required research paper structure, are weak in research training and writing for international journals, lack a critical analysis of the related studies I suggest they always work with an experienced native speaking copy-editor, or better, a co-author experienced in publishing in high-level scientific journals. Another limitation of Chinese papers is that they often fail to provide a conceptual or theoretical basis for their hypotheses. Lack novel practical or theoretical contributions have weak English be methodologically simplistic replicate Western research findings in China without considering the indigenous Chinese context

Voices from editors I believe this is because there is a stress to people to publish in order to publish and not for conducting "innovative" research Manuscripts from Asia in general, and China in particular are often more literature-driven than issue-driven. First let me say that we do not have huge numbers of submissions from China as we did in the past, because word has spread that we come down very hard on plagiarism. By this I mean that Chinese authors will sometimes review the literature on a specific topic or group of topics and develop hypotheses or models with the justification being that the hypotheses or models proposed have never been proposed or tested. True, the hypotheses/models may be novel but this does not mean that they are worthwhile or make any meaningful contribution to theory or practice.

Emerald 学术研究基金 我们的发展与学科的进步息息相关 中国管理学研究基金 全球优秀博士论文奖 更多信息： info.emeraldinsight.com/research/awards/index.htm

Emerald/IACMR管理学基金奖 开始日期：每年5月份左右 申请要求： 在线提交材料 正在进行的项目 以前未申请过 该奖项的学者 2011年Emerald管理学基金奖由北大光华管理学院的何文龙与路江涌获得 在线提交材料 附信(Covering Letter):参与者姓名、联系方式、项目名称等 项目建议书(Proposal):2,000英文单词、目标、结果、效益、预算等 奖励：奖金+证书+CMS期刊访问权+IACMR会员一年 优胜奖1名 高度赞扬奖1-2名

Emerald 优秀博士论文奖 - 正在申请中 开始时间：每年4月份 奖项介绍：与EFMD(欧洲管理发展基金会)合作设立； Emerald出版社12个领域的12本期刊，参与组织此奖； 申请要求： 2010年10月1日至2013 年10月1日期间已经完成并通过博士学位考试或将要参加博士学位考试的研究人员， http://www.emeraldinsight.com.cn/webpages.php?id=25 在线提交材料 不超过2, 000单词的研究概要 详细说明函(Covering Letter): 描述被该奖项考虑的因素、 发表的研究成果、其它相关信息等 来自导师或资深教师的推荐信 奖励：奖金+证书+研究成果推荐发表 优胜奖1名— €1,500 高度赞扬奖2-3名— 证书奖励

谢谢各位 ！