優質教育基金研究計劃研討會: 經驗分享 - 透過Web 2.0推動高小程度 探究式專題研習的協作教學模式

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
高考短文改错专题 张柱平. 高考短文改错专题 一. 对短文改错的要求 高考短文改错的目的在于测试考生判断发现, 纠正语篇中 语言使用错误的能力, 以及考察考生在语篇中综合运用英 语知识的能力. 二. 高考短文改错的命题特点 高考短文改错题的形式有说明文. 短文故事. 书信等, 具有很 强的实用性.
Advertisements

英语中考复习探讨 如何写好书面表达 宁波滨海学校 李爱娣. 近三年中考试题分析 评分标准 试卷评分与练习 (2009 年书面表达为例 ) 影响给分的因素: 存在问题 书面表达高分技巧 建议.
第七课:电脑和网络. 生词 上网 vs. 网上 我上网看天气预报。 今天早上看了网上的天气预报。 正式 zhèngshì (报告,会议,纪录) 他被这所学校正式录取 大桥已经落成,日内就可以正式通车 落伍 luòw ǔ 迟到 chídào 他怕迟到,六点就起床了.
What do you see? What do you recognize? What do you think we are going to learn?
Did You Know III 你知道吗?(III)
全国卷书面表达备考建议 广州市第六中学 王慧珊 Aug. 24th, 2015.
EBSCO Publishing 施宏明
透過合作學習照顧學習差異 工作坊 2009年11月9日 九龍九龍塘沙福道19號教育局 九龍塘教育服務中心西座3樓W301室 香港教育學院課程與教學學系助理教授 陳錦榮博士
信息技术在教学中的应用 信息技术应用于教学的整体观、系统观 信息技术应用于教学的整体观、系统观 对信息技术整合的理解——教师的视角
Student Research Projects: Inquiry Learning 学生研究项目:探究式学习
IFY Parents Meeting 3 December 年12月3日家长会
小一家長注意事項 九龍塘天主教華德學校.
专题八 书面表达.
用合作和探索教学方法 讲授《中文》的阅读课
Teaching the Chinese Copula 是 for CSL Purposes
Chinese hot pot - Harvard Project
How can we become good leamers
Today – Academic Presentation 学术报告
2014年上海市中职校学业水平考试 英语学科总结报告
學校圖書館的就業狀況 Careers in School Libraries
2012高考英语书面表达精品课件:话题作文6 计划与愿望.
深圳市南山实验教育集团 Shenzhen Nanshan Experimental Educational Group 2014年1月3日.
初中进阶 (2346 期 ) 1 版. 1. What types of bullying do you know about? Physical hitting, tripping, stealing and hair pulling Social telling other kids.
摘要的开头: The passage mainly tells us sth.
How can we be a member of the Society? You should finish the following tasks if you want to be a member of the Birdwatching Society.
Unit2 School life Reading 2.
Unit 9 What does he look like?
The keys to Unit 2 Section A 趣味英语
专题讲座 武强中学外语组 制作:刘瑞红.
What do you think of game shows?
Unit 4 I used to be afraid of the dark.
What water is more suitable for nurturing the goldfish
Module 5 Shopping 第2课时.
Unit 1 Reading School life in the UK (Period 2) Aims and demands:
Ⅱ、从方框里选择合适的单词填空,使句子完整通顺。 [ size beef special large yet ]
教師的成長 與 教師專業能力理念架構 教育局 專業發展及培訓分部 TCF, how much you know about it?
Understanding Report Cards 读懂成绩单 Mr Alex Ward Director of Studies 教学总监
Xi’an RTVU October 19, 2009 Susan C. Aldridge, PhD
肢體殘障人士 Physically handicapped
「嗨!老同學…」 S. Chen & F. Chen.
By Gu Xiaojin, Executive Vice Chair China Youth Development Foundation
G10 PARENT MEETING COURSE SELECTION 高一选课家长会 PRESENTED BY B
LCCC 2018 Spring Festival April 28, 2018.
問題導向學習教學策略(PBL) 對學生學習成效的初探
參考資料 American Association of School Librarians & Association for Education Communications and Technology (1998). Information Literacy Standards for Students.
Classroom 2.0 教學媒體 第七組 圖傳系 邱欣瑩 圖傳系 張心維
如何利用教学资源库 提高师生的信息素养 How to Utilize the Teaching Resource Library
Lesson 28 How Do I Learn English?
Unit 1.
Try to write He Mengling Daqu Middle School.
Could you please clean your room?
21st Century Teaching & Learning
SectionA(Grammar Focus-4c)
GRANT UNION HIGH SCHOOL
Have you read Treasure Island yet?
Education Database 教育研究資料庫
Unit 5 Reading A Couch Potato.
Guide to a successful PowerPoint design – simple is best
-----Reading: ZhongGuanCun
98年國中基測暨新量尺計分方式宣導 宜昌國中 詹如晴老師.
九十八年國中基本學力測驗說明 國民中學學生基本學力測驗 推動工作委員會.
M; Well, let me check again with Jane
澳洲英語授課暑期研習分享: 參與研習對於大學教師國際觀之影響
based on book edited by Czippán, Varga and Faye 2010:
台灣未來學校 學校發展中心 (SDC) /主持人計劃.
怎樣把同一評估 給與在不同班級的學生 How to administer the Same assessment to students from Different classes and groups.
自主练悟 ①(2017·桂林市联考)To them, life is a competition — they have to do _______ (good) than their peers to be happy. ②(2017·菏泽市模拟)People who forgive.
991 中大英語自學小組 English Study Group
國際理事的角色 講師: 年指派理事 G L T 地 區 領 導 人 江達隆 博士.
变化的新环境,变化的图书馆 Changing Landscape, Changing Libraries
Presentation transcript:

優質教育基金研究計劃研討會: 經驗分享 - 透過Web 2.0推動高小程度 探究式專題研習的協作教學模式

優質教育基金研究計劃研討會經驗分享 透過Web 2.0推動高小程度 探究式專題研習的 協作教學模式 2018年11月8日 優質教育基金研究計劃研討會經驗分享 透過Web 2.0推動高小程度 探究式專題研習的 協作教學模式 透過Web 2.0推動高小程度探究式專題研習的協作教學模式 Can anyone tell me what is Web 2.0? Web 2.0 can be understood as the 2nd generation of the Web The 1st generation of the Web – Some people create web pages and publish them on the Web for sharing. And users use the Web as an information source. Communication is rather one way Web 1.0 Web 2.0 - the 2nd generation of the Web Many more people create web content because it’s so easy to create them by using blogs or wiki – the technology behind Wikipedia And it’s easy for many people to use these tools to collaborate and to communicate online So people call Web 2.0 as participatory Web

2018年11月8日 計劃概覽 探究式專題研習 1. 探究式學習是以學生為中心的敎學法,它能幫助學生在學習常識科時綜合共通能力、知識和價值觀。 2. 在探究式學習過程中,學生是知識的主動建構者,敎師是學習的促進者。 3. 學生需要自行提出問題、搜尋重要的資料、尋找答案 。 Other than Web 2.0, our project has to do with inquiry project based learning I believe we all know專題研習 What is 探究式學習? 1. 探究式學習是以學生為中心的敎學法,它能幫助學生在學習常識科時綜合共通能力、知識和價值觀。 2. 在探究式學習過程中,學生是知識的主動建構者,敎師是學習的促進者。 3.學生需要自行提出問題、搜尋重要的資料、尋找答案 。 And 探究式學習 is what Edb tries to promote in primary schools through GS subject. E.g., here talks about 透過常識科的探究學習發展學生的批判性思考及創造力 3

2018年11月8日 Our project propose a 協作教學模式 Why? Because several years ago, I watched how some P4 students presented their group projects and I noticed something wrong: E.g., A Primary 4 group presented their key points by having one member holding up a A3 size paper E.g., Another P4 group produced 20 slides for their IBL project presentation but only used several of them during their presentation – prepared by their mom or helper  Or they prepared all the slides but didn’t know how to use them effectively. These students seemed to be lacking various abilities and skills needed for doing well in their inquiry projects. In order to equip students with abilities and skills they need, I brought together a team of 4 teachers to support students’ projects several years ago. With this collaborating teaching effort and with support from school leaders and an expert in inquiry project-based learning, Student did better in their projects; Student at the same time improved a lot in various key learning dimensions Centre for Information Technology in Education 4

試驗性研究—研究成果 學術會議論文 : Centre for Information Technology in Education 2018年11月8日 試驗性研究—研究成果 學術會議論文 : Chu, S., Chow, K., & Tse, S.K. (2009). The development of students’ information literacy and IT skills via inquiry PBL and collaborative teaching. Proceedings of the 2009 ASIS&T Annual Meeting, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada, November 6-11, 2009. Chu, S., Tse, S.K., Loh, E. K. Y., Chow, K., Fung, H. F., & Ng, H. W. R. (2008). Primary four students’ development of reading ability through inquiry-based learning projects. The 2008 IASL Conference [CD-ROM]. University of California at Berkeley, Berkeley, CA, USA, 3rd to 6th August 2008. 期刊論文: Chu, S. (2009). Inquiry project-based learning with a partnership of three types of teachers and the school librarian. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 60(8): 1671-1686. Chu, S., Chow, K., Tse, S.K. & Kuhlthau, C.C., (2008). Grade Four Students’ Development of Research Skills through Inquiry-based Learning Projects. School Libraries Worldwide. 14(1):10-37. 中文學術書籍中的章節: 朱啟華、嚴影芙、鄒景芬、周志堅、夏柳薇及馮漢輝 (2008)。透過探究式學習改善小四學生的中文寫作能力。見布森祖、蘇詠梅編《綜合學習:理論與實踐(小學篇)》,頁139-151。香港:時信出版(香港)有限公司。 周志堅、朱啟華、吳淑嫻、方志新 、關詠茵及梁雅達 (2008) 。慧科搜索(WiseNews)資料庫與小四探究式學習計劃。見布森祖、蘇詠梅編《綜合學習:理論與實踐(小學篇)》,頁177-198。香港:時信出版(香港)有限公司。 The pilot was very fruitful and it results in many publications and eventually led to a QEF grant to support our project to expand this teaching approach from 1 school to 4 schools Boris – photo taking for Principals, teachers, CoI, & project team Centre for Information Technology in Education