英美法期末報告 指導教授:許舜喨 老師 班級:財經法律研究所二甲 學生:陳宜榛 學號:MA1X0106 學生:何 欣 學號:MA3X0204

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The Third Period Unit 8 Is there a post office near here?
Advertisements

Unit6 Reading (II) 将下列直接引语改成间接引语 : 1 “I want to stay at home.” He told me… 2 “I’m very busy today.” My mother said… 3 “It’s raining heavily now.” She.
Unit 4 Finding your way Integrated skills New words and phrases: past prep. 在另一边,到另一侧 treasure n. 宝藏 turning n. 转弯处 traffic n. 交通,来往车辆 traffic lights.
Grammar 1. What do the road signs mean? walk straight on turn left turn right traffic lights crossroads zebra crossing.
期末考试作文讲解 % 的同学赞成住校 30% 的学生反对住校 1. 有利于培养我们良好的学 习和生活习惯; 1. 学生住校不利于了解外 界信息; 2 可与老师及同学充分交流有 利于共同进步。 2. 和家人交流少。 在寄宿制高中,大部分学生住校,但仍有一部分学生选 择走读。你校就就此开展了一次问卷调查,主题为.
第七课:电脑和网络. 生词 上网 vs. 网上 我上网看天气预报。 今天早上看了网上的天气预报。 正式 zhèngshì (报告,会议,纪录) 他被这所学校正式录取 大桥已经落成,日内就可以正式通车 落伍 luòw ǔ 迟到 chídào 他怕迟到,六点就起床了.
L5-L6 Review Oct. 30, Adj. as predicate 1.She is tall and pretty. 2.His house is pretty but very small. 3.Is your book expensive ? (try different.
國立成功大學 外文系 高實玫 “Theme”及“Rheme”的應用 國立成功大學 外文系 高實玫
英美法各論 真理大學財經法律系 助理教授楊智傑.
Unit 1 Talking about the past(19)
Chapter 5 精华内容 By Lucia.
Section A Period 1 (1a-2d) Unit 8. 1.There be “ 某处有 ( 存在 ) 某人或某物 ” 结构 :There be (is, are, was, were)+ 名词 + 地点状语。 There are forty-eight students in our.
神愛世人, 甚至將他的獨生子賜給他們, 叫一切信他的, 不至滅亡, 反得永生。 約翰3:16.
真實的敬拜 二 True Worship 2.
中考英语书面表达题型的解题技巧 Sheng Xiaomei.
Unit1 What’s the matter? 学科网.
Unit 12 Life is full of the unexpected.
5B 教材分析.
摘要的开头: The passage mainly tells us sth.
Understanding Interest Rates
What were you doing when the UFO arrived?
WRITNG Welcome to enjoy English..
Could you please clean your room?
Been During the Vacation?
關係子句(一):關係代名詞 who/whom/which/whose/that
動詞的時態 - by May.
Dì二十課 看bìng Dì二十课 看bìng
BII.U.VI 一、.Words I. shame n 1. 羞耻(心),羞愧(感)U 2. 羞辱,耻辱
遭环保人士围堵 日本暂停南极捕鲸.
康軒國中英語 文法教學 PPT 過去進行式.
英语表示人体部位的词 Body Parts in English 温州中学 张怡.
From Misunderstanding to Understanding
A Burning Heart Luke 24: 13 – 35 路加 二四:
Uses of “It” I、 用作人称代词的 it II. 用作先行词的 it III. 用在强调句型中的 it
Book 5 Unit 5 & 6 名詞子句.
Unit 1 鸳大九义校 杨付春.
From Fear to Faith 路加福音 Luke 8: From Fear to Faith 路加福音 Luke 8:22-25.
十七課 選課(xuǎn kè) 十七课 选课(xuǎn kè)
Zhōng wén kè 中 文 课 Chinese Class 3.

高中英文第一冊 第六單元 重補修用.
英美法期末報告 指導教授:許舜喨 老師 班級:財經法律研究所二甲 學生:陳宜榛 學號:MA1X0106 學生:何欣 學號:MA3X0204
Objective Clauses (宾语从句)
漂亮的台灣水雉What Beautiful Jacanas in Taiwan !
Talk about:What time is it ?=What’s the time?
十架七言 Last Words from the Cross
美剧口语全解析 Ada老师.
眾多人民都是同一個民族 第四代新青生活聖言 「祂要同他們住在一起;他們要作祂的人民, 祂親自要『與他們同在』。」 (默21:3) 5月
第十二章 名詞子句 陳巧芬 賴孟屏 林珮雯.
敬拜的真義 The Essence of Worship 波特蘭靈糧堂 July 30, 2017.
Area of interaction focus
英美法期末報告 指導教授:許舜喨 老師 班級:財經法律研究所二甲 學生:陳宜榛 學號:MA1X0106 學生:何 欣 學號:
English Writing 英语书面表达训练 写过去的事.
基本句型 1)主 +谓(SV)例如:   I work. 我工作。 2)主 + 谓 + 宾(SVO)例如:   She studies English. 她学英语 3)主 + 系 + 表(SVP)例如:   John is busy. 约翰忙。 。 4)主 + 动 + 宾 + 补(SVOC)例如:   Time.
英美法期末報告 指導教授:許舜喨 老師 班級:財經法律研究所二甲 學生:陳宜榛 學號:MA1X0106 學生: 學號:
九月十七日 Do now-写中文 Who Name also is/are/am friend.
汉语和英语 在致使结构的表达上的 共性和个性 张冬盈.
算 (原文:logizomai) 我告诉你们,经上写着说:『他被列在罪犯之中。』这话必应验在我身上;因为那关系我的事必然成就。(路22:37) It is written: 'And he was numbered with the transgressors'; and I tell you that.
大熊‧小熊 Big Bears. Little Bears
Part2 考点1 Part2 语法专题 考点1 冠词.
——2014 高考英语试卷题型(单选、完型)分析暨复习对策
谁能使我们与神的爱隔绝呢? Who shall separate us from the Love of God?
是祢叫我活过来! 2:1你 们 死 在 过 犯 罪 恶 之 中 , 他 叫 你 们 活 过 来 ,2:2那 时 你 们 在 其 中 行 事 为 人 随 从 今 世 的 风 俗 , 顺 服 空 中 掌 权 者 的 首 领 , 就 是 现 今 在 悖 逆 之 子 心 中 运 行 的 邪 灵 。 1 As.
高考英语短文改错答题技巧 砀山中学 黄东亚.
自主练悟 ①(2017·桂林市联考)To them, life is a competition — they have to do _______ (good) than their peers to be happy. ②(2017·菏泽市模拟)People who forgive.
馬太福音 Matthew 27: 耶穌站在巡撫面前;巡撫問他說:「你是猶太人的王嗎?」耶穌說:「你說的是。」12 他被祭司長和長老控告的時候,甚麼都不回答。13 彼拉多就對他說:「他們作見證告你這麼多的事,你沒有聽見嗎?」 11 Meanwhile Jesus stood before.
复活以后 After Resurrection
多维阅读第13级.
Euangelion.
馬太福音 Matthew 21: 「你們再聽一個比喻:有個家主栽了一個葡萄園,周圍圈上籬笆,裏面挖了一個壓酒池,蓋了一座樓,租給園戶,就往外國去了。34 收果子的時候近了,就打發僕人到園戶那裏去收果子。 33 “Listen to another parable: There was.
Presentation transcript:

英美法期末報告 指導教授:許舜喨 老師 班級:財經法律研究所二甲 學生:陳宜榛 學號:MA1X0106 學生:何 欣 學號:MA3X0204

In its Opinion, the trial court described the facts underlying the instant appeal as follows: 原審法院所描述的基本即時事實如下: Police Officer David Tamamato ["Officer Tamamato"] was on duty in full uniform with his partner, Police Officer Erick Ruck ["Officer Ruck",] on March 16, 2013, at 11:30 p.m., on the 5600 block of North Broad Street in Philadelphia, PA. On that date and time, the officers were out of their patrol car conducting a pedestrian investigation of a male[,] who was urinating on the highway. Officer Tamamato was covering [*2] his partner[, Officer] Ruck[,] as he dealt with the male pedestrian. [Herring] was walking along the sidewalk when she approached Officer Tamamato on his right side with two cups of coffee in her hand. Herring stopped and asked Officer Tamamato if the beer store was open. The Officer replied he didn't know, and directed [Herring] across the street to the store's location. [Herring] inquired a second time and attempted to walk between the two police officers. Officer Tamamato instructed her to walk around the investigation-- extending his hand out to prevent [Herring] from coming between them and the suspect.   2

警察David Tamamato [“Tamamato警官”]與他的夥伴 正穿著制服在執勤,警官Erick Ruck[“Ruck 警官”] 3月 16日,2013年,在11時30分,北寬的5600塊街賓夕法 尼亞州費城。在該日期和時間,警官們離開自己的巡邏 車並對一名男性進行考察,那名男性小便在高速公路上。 Tamamato警官正在保護他的夥伴[警官Ruck],因為他 正在處理那位男性。 [Herring]手拿著兩杯咖啡並沿著人 行道走到Tamamato警官右手邊。Herring停下來問 Tamamator警官啤酒店是否還開著。該官員回答說,他 不知道,並指示[Herring]對街的啤酒店的位置。 [Herring]問第二次,並試圖在兩個警察之間行走。 Tamamato警官指示她走動的方向 並 伸出手,以防止 [Herring]走到他們與犯罪嫌疑人之間。   3

[] Officer Tamamato testified [that Herring] responded, "I can walk anywhere I want, bitch," and threw both cups of coffee directly in his face, hitting his right cheek and right eye. The coffee was hot and [Officer Tamamato] felt burning when it hit his skin. He [later] saw redness around his eye area. [Officer Tamamato] observed [that Herring] had a strong odor of alcohol on her breath and slurred speech. Officer Tamamato believed [Herring] to be under the influence of alcohol[,] and placed [Herring] in custody. Officer Tamamato was transported to Albert Einstein Medical Center for [*3] treatment[,] where he received a flush for his eye. There was a redness to the officer's face and cheek. 4

Tamamato警官被送至愛因斯坦醫療中心治療,在 那裡他沖洗了他的眼睛。他的臉和臉頰也因此而發 紅。 Tamamato警官證實[Herring]回答說:“我可以走在 任何地方我想,賤人”,並直接把兩杯咖啡往他臉上, 咖啡擊中他的右臉頰和右眼。咖啡是熱的 [Tamamato警官]當咖啡擊中在他臉上時他感覺在燃 燒。他[之後]看到他的眼周發紅。 [Tamamato警官] 觀察到Herring有很重的酒精氣味因為她的呼吸和說 話含糊不清。Tamamato警官認為[Herring]是酒精 的作用下而產生以上行為,因此拘留了[Herring]。   Tamamato警官被送至愛因斯坦醫療中心治療,在 那裡他沖洗了他的眼睛。他的臉和臉頰也因此而發 紅。   5

上訴理由: 6 Herring now presents the following claims for our review: 1. Was not the evidence insufficient to prove aggravated assault[,] as there was no intent to cause bodily injury? 2. Was not the evidence insufficient to prove [PIC,] as coffee does not meet the definition of an instrument of crime? 3. Was not the evidence insufficient to prove [REAP,] as there was no actual risk of serious bodily injury or death? 下列項模為Herring提出供我們的審查的項目: 1.證據不足已證明有嚴重的攻擊[,]因為沒有故意造成身體傷害? 2.證據不足已證明[PIC],因為咖啡不符合犯罪的工具的定義? 3.證據不足已證明[REAP],因為並沒有出現實際造成嚴重的人身傷害或死亡的風險?   [REAP] is a crime directed against reckless conduct entailing a serious risk to life or limb out of proportion to any utility the conduct might have. [REAP]是針對魯莽行為將會導致嚴重危害生命或身體不相稱的任何公用設施的行為可 能構成犯罪。 6

判決&理由 COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, APPELLEE V 判決&理由 COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, APPELLEE V. KENYA HERRING, APPELLANT HOLDING 1 aggravated assault 加重暴行罪 6-23 months county jail affirmed 確定下級判決 2 simple assault 普通暴行罪 probation terms for a maximum period of 3 years. 三年以下緩刑 3 REAP (recklessly endangering another person) 4 PIC 凶器準備集合罪 (possessing an instrument of crime) Vacated 廢棄 5 public drunkenness no sentence 7

RATIONALE 8

9

10

結論 We conclude that the evidence is sufficient to sustain Herring's conviction of REAP REAP(recklessly endangering another person). 我們得出這樣的結論的證據足以維持Herring的罪行。 The evidence reflects that Herring threw hot coffee into Officer Tamamato's face, and walked between Officer Tamamato and his partner during an investigation where the officers had a suspect against a wall. N.T., 12/11/13, at 21. We conclude that this evidence is sufficient to establish that Herring consciously disregarded a known risk of death or great bodily harm to Officer Tamamato and his partner by interfering with the officers. As the trial court observed in its Opinion, "[Herring's] actions put the police officers and public at risk." Trial Court Opinion, 2/4/15, at 6. Accordingly, we cannot grant Herring relief on this claim.   證據反映了Herring將熱咖啡灑至Tamamato警官的臉,警官在執行勤務時,Herring在 Tamamato警官和他的夥伴之間走去。2013年12月11日,我們認為這些證據足以證明 Herring干擾警官執勤並故亦忽視對於警官的死亡或身體傷害,也已經知道Tamamato警 官和他的夥伴身處在一個危險之中。由於原審法院在其意見指出,“[Herring]的行動把警 察和公眾處於危險之中。”審判法庭意見,2015年2月4日。因此,我們不能對這種說法給 予Herring 緩刑(無罪)。   11